#5dtorgb gh2 pdf
I have more respect for this pdf - that is the only available document right now - than all those book publishers with their 'how to' crap books.
Imagine putting the whole guide together. It's a lot of work though so I never get to finish it.
Actually I've been planning to make a simple (free) tutorial video to do raw on the 50D (for beginners). Of course, it would be cool if someone would make the whole thing for free. Small chance I'll find something new in there that makes it worth the money.īut hey, if you want to jump into the game now. I haven't bought the guide and I won't, because I've been following the developments for hours a day the past few weeks. Just imagine if that film was shoot on a Canon.Don't like it? Don't buy it. Someone rightly noted that they "forgot" to mention Upstream Color by Shane Carruth shot on a hacked GH2 showing at Sundance. I think that article is the final evidence that "The emperor has no clothes!". I still remember they wrote several articles trying to reject Zacuto shootout results, so nothing new under the sun. Finally they suggested that FM or other settings costs 10$. They even linked that post on their newsletter. Once they realize that a lot of people were bringing into question that test, they replied that they naively quoted the shootout asking their readers "What do you guys think of the test?".Ī serious magazine doesn't publish work form other people quoting their results without implicitly endorse them. Their website is crammed with ads and their newsletter tracks your choices. I was subcribed to their newsletter until few weeks ago and I quit because they continuously hammer in Canon products (as most of website out there). On this blog post ( ) James DeRuvo was calling his shootout into question and he replied:Ī lot of people have been saying that’s unfair and the hacked GH2 has so much recoverable-detail in those deep shadows that the dynamic range is actually there. Reading his replies it's clear to me that he knows pretty much nothing.
#5dtorgb gh2 pro
You can perform such test in a week end only if you are a pro and you know exactly what to do. Maybe they meant a donation on nofilmschool for the think we have to separate the shootout guy from nofilmschool.Ĭlearly that guy doesn't know anything about comparing these camera. Īlso mentioned in that blog post is a 14-42mm lens. On Kevin Good's blog there is clearly no mention of $10. So hopefully he contacts me again and borrows my gh2 and does a shootout part 2.Īs for the $10 for the hack not sure how nofilmschool got that. I did message him and he said he was getting a lot of flak for the gh2 test and wanted to give the gh2 a fair shake.
He had set a tight timetable to get this shootout done which is sometimes good and maybe this time it didn't workout as well. I think (and I'm guessing here) they shot these and did not realize they had that big difference in exposures until after shooting because he borrowed this from me late on Friday and by Monday he was contacting me to return it. And I'm quite sure he was rooting for the nex or gh2 to come out on top since this was also according to him a test to see which camera he would buy to use on his aerial videos. When he picked up the camera he immediately told me "I think we got our winner right here!". In defense of the guy I'm a 100% sure he was not against the gh2 or the Sony. This caused a bit of a bias against the gh2s low light performance. I have to agree the test was a bit flawed since the exposures were clearly different between the 4 cameras. I'm the guy whom Kevin Good(the shootout guy) borrowed the hacked gh2 from.
0 kommentar(er)
